<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div><div>Hi Chris,<br><br></div>Thanks for your response.<br><br></div>Unfortunately I use the 2.0.7 version. Does the logger from 2.0.8 have any dependencies to the newer version that doesn't let it be run on the older version?<br>
<br></div>Also, to be clear about your point that information is not lost, can I assume that web10G collects every statistics for every flow, and the interface just presents that data, but doesn't change what flows are being monitored or what stats are being collected? <br>
<br></div>Thanks<br></div>Mojgan Ghasemi<br></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 1:14 PM, rapier <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rapier@psc.edu" target="_blank">rapier@psc.edu</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Hi Mojgan,<br>
<br>
If you are using the 2.0.8 version of the estats userland there is a<br>
tools in util/C called web10g-logger which will monitor all connections<br>
every N milliseconds (default is 1000). Essentially it is a mash-up of<br>
listconn and readvars. I should point out that web10g doesn't actually<br>
lose information from a connection. From the moment the connection is<br>
established the instrument set is collecting data. For example -<br>
watchvars will give you the cumulative data for each metric since the<br>
inception of the connection regardless of when you run watchvars.<br>
<br>
Chris Rapier<br>
<br>
On 7/10/14, 1:00 PM, mojgan ghasemi wrote:<br>
> Hi,<br>
> Forgive me if this has already been asked!<br>
><br>
> I have web10G running on a kernel, and I want to perform watch variables<br>
> on a connection from its starting point, without missing any information<br>
> about it.<br>
><br>
> If I wait for the connection to get created first, and then use the CID<br>
> shown by listconns, I am missing the initial packets and there will be a<br>
> delay between monitoring start time and the flow start time. I'm<br>
> assuming those information is lost.<br>
><br>
> How can I ask web10G to monitor a connection "before" its creation, so<br>
> that I am sure all of its info is recorded?<br>
><br>
> Alternatively if this is not possible, how can I ask web10G to monitor<br>
> /"all"/ the connections, so that I am certain the watchvars will capture<br>
> the flow's initial stats?<br>
><br>
> Thanks,<br>
> Mojgan Ghasemi<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Web10g-user mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Web10g-user@web10g.org">Web10g-user@web10g.org</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/listinfo/web10g-user" target="_blank">https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/listinfo/web10g-user</a><br>
><br>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE visit <a href="https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/unsubscribe/web10g-user" target="_blank">https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/unsubscribe/web10g-user</a><br>
><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Web10g-user mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Web10g-user@web10g.org">Web10g-user@web10g.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/listinfo/web10g-user" target="_blank">https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/listinfo/web10g-user</a><br>
<br>
To UNSUBSCRIBE visit <a href="https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/unsubscribe/web10g-user" target="_blank">https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/unsubscribe/web10g-user</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>