[Web10g-user] O/S and kernel/patch versions

[rapier]

Jim,

We can put a 2.6.32 kernel patch set up on the site. Well, to be more 
specific, we will put one up on the site. We're doing a couple of tweaks 
over the next week to handle some changes and a minor inconsistency 
introduced recently. I should point out that this 2.6.32 patchset will 
be build against the generic 2.6.32 release so it may take some extra 
work to get it to incorporate into one of the many subversions of 
2.6.32. Usually these aren't too hard though.

I hope to have the 2.6.32 patch set up early next week. If you don't see 
anything soon please ping me and I'll let you know the status.

Chris

On 8/21/13 12:01 PM, Alles, Jim wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Kevin Kawaguchi <ktkawaguchi at ucdavis.edu> wrote:
>>> Good Afternoon Everybody,
>>>
>>> We are about to build a web10g server for some researchers.  We are typically a RHEL/CentOS shop so kernel wise we would be behind the times on recent web10g patches.  As an example PerfSonar is based on CentOS and has a kernel version of something like 2.6.32-358 while the web10g patches are way into the 3.x (and the oldest web10g patch is 2.6.38).
>>>
>
> I am new here and noob for builds. Gotta have a reason to jump in.
>
> I would like to experiment with what I can see on my favorite UTM (router), Untangle. I think the edge of my network is a good place to view metrics.
>
> They are about to release their v.10, which is based on Debian 6.0 (squeeze) and 2.6.32 kernel.
>
> I will be starting by installing their Beta, non-production, at home. Am I on my own for a patch?
>
> Thanks, any hints welcome (including go home ;)
>
> Jim A.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Web10g-user mailing list
> Web10g-user at web10g.org
> https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/listinfo/web10g-user
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE visit https://lists.psc.edu/mailman/unsubscribe/web10g-user
>